Beat:Your:PB

sports science, research, training and performance

With swimming representing 10-15% of total race time, anyone got any views on what % of training time its worth allocating to swimming?

Looking back to when I did the Ironman, I was swimming for 4-5 sessions a week (to gain approx 2-3 mins?), and have always thought I should have allocated more time to cycling where 20-30 min gains are not unrealistic.

Cheers

JULIAN

Tags: ironman, swimming, volume

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Plenty research into the effects of high-volume swim training on performance suggests there is no advantage to piling on the kilometres.

For me, what's important is not just being able to complete the swim distance in a reasonable time, BUT complete it so I can start the bike at full tilt. In real terms this means I will swim for approx 20% of total training time; 2-3 sessions per week - two speed sessions and one endurance upto race distance +x%, say 2,000m if I'm focussing on olympic races.

Reply to This

Reply to This

RSS

Search Beat:Your:PB


Badge

Loading…

About beatyourpb.com

beatyourPB.com is run and managed by a bunch of active athletes who are passionate about performance. The site is owned by PB Worldwide Limited, a company registered in the UK.


Disclaimer
The material contained on this website is in no way intended to replace professional coaching or medical advice and should not be used as a basis for diagnosis or choice of treatment or training.

© 2010   Created by Beat Your PB

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service